Weapons bearing Nazi symbols, and the offences that apply.

The point most reports miss.

A story like this leads with the Nazi symbol. The symbol is the part that carries the weight in the headline. It is not the part that carries the weight in the sentence. The prohibited-symbols offences carry a maximum of 12 months. The import offence carries a maximum of 10 years. The State weapons-possession offence carries a maximum of 14 years. So the item that sits at the top of the news report sits near the bottom of the penalty scale.

That gap matters, because a person who reads only the coverage will worry about the wrong charge. The rest of this article sets out each regime, what the Crown has to prove, and where the real exposure sits. Nothing here decides the matter in the courts. Every person charged is presumed innocent until the case is proved.

Is it illegal to import a knuckle duster into Australia?

Yes. A knuckle duster is a prohibited import. It sits in the second tier of goods under the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 (Cth), which means it cannot be brought into the country without written permission. Importing a tier 2 good without that permission is an offence under section 233BAB(5) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth). The maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment or 2,500 penalty units, or both.

The Australian Border Force screens international mail and cargo. A weapon found in a consignment is seized at the border. Where the Border Force forms a view that an offence may have been committed, it refers the matter to the Australian Federal Police, which decides whether to charge. The import charge does not depend on the parcel reaching the addressee. It is complete on the act of importation. A recipient who never physically holds the item can still be the subject of an import charge if the evidence links them to bringing it in.

Where the weapon also bears a Nazi symbol, the importation engages a second layer. The prohibited-imports rules were extended to cover goods that depict or contain a prohibited symbol. So a Nazi-insignia weapon can fall foul of the import rules both as a weapon and as a symbol-bearing good. The practical result is the same: it cannot lawfully be brought in.

Are knuckle dusters illegal to own in NSW?

Yes. A knuckle duster is a prohibited weapon under Schedule 1 of the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW). The Act defines it as a device made of a hard substance that can be fitted over two or more knuckles to protect the hand and increase the force of a blow. Possessing or using a prohibited weapon without a permit is an offence under section 7. The maximum penalty is 14 years' imprisonment.

Two points follow. First, each weapon is capable of being charged as a separate count. A search that turns up several prohibited weapons can produce several section 7 charges, not one. Second, section 7 is an either-way offence. It can be dealt with in the Local Court, where the maximum the Local Court can impose is capped, or on indictment in the District Court, where the full 14-year maximum is available. Where an offence of this kind is dealt with on indictment, a standard non-parole period applies, which the sentencing court uses as a reference point.

Knuckle dusters have long been on the prohibited list. From 1 July 2026 the position tightened further, with knuckle dusters treated as prohibited weapons on a consistent basis across the country. The general public cannot buy, make, sell, import or hold one without lawful authority. The narrow exemptions that exist, for example for accredited collections, film production or law enforcement, do not help a private person who orders one online.

Is it illegal to display a Nazi symbol in Australia?

Yes. In NSW, section 93ZA of the Crimes Act 1900 makes it an offence to knowingly display a Nazi symbol by a public act without reasonable excuse. The maximum penalty is 12 months' imprisonment, or a fine of 100 penalty units, or both, for an individual. For a corporation the fine rises to 500 penalty units. The offence began in NSW in 2022.

The Crown must prove three things. The accused displayed a Nazi symbol. The display was a public act, which the Act defines broadly enough to reach conduct visible to the public, including online. And the accused knew what they were displaying. A person who did not know the symbol was there, or did not know what it was, is in a different position from one who chose to display it.

Displaying a symbol is not the same as importing an object that bears one. A weapon found in a parcel, or stored in a house, is not on its own a public display. The display offence needs a public act. This is one reason the symbol charge and the import charge do different work, and why a matter can involve one without the other.

What are the Commonwealth prohibited-symbols offences?

The Commonwealth added its own set of offences to the Criminal Code in 2023. Section 80.2H makes it an offence to publicly display a prohibited symbol, which covers both a Nazi symbol and the symbol of a listed terrorist organisation. The basic maximum is 12 months' imprisonment. A higher maximum of five years applies where the display is tied to the sort of conduct the provision is aimed at, such as the spread of ideas of racial superiority or the incitement of hatred.

The same package of laws criminalised the Nazi salute performed in public, and created a trading offence in section 80.2J. The trading offence reaches a person who deals in goods that depict or contain a prohibited symbol, where the person knows or is reckless as to the connection with Nazi ideology. Trade is defined widely. It covers selling, leasing and renting, and also the steps taken with a view to sale, such as possessing, concealing, transporting or preparing goods for supply.

The fault element for the Commonwealth display offence is recklessness. The prosecution does not have to prove the accused knew the symbol was on the prohibited list. It is enough that the accused was aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that it was, and went ahead anyway. That is a lower bar than knowledge, and it is worth understanding early in any matter of this kind.

What counts as a reasonable excuse or exception?

Both the State and Commonwealth schemes carve out legitimate uses. A display done reasonably and in good faith for an academic, artistic or educational purpose is protected, as is a display for another purpose in the public interest. That is what allows a museum, a teacher, a historian, a journalist or a film-maker to use the material without committing the offence.

There is a separate and important carve-out for the swastika used in connection with Buddhism, Hinduism or Jainism. In those traditions the symbol is an ancient sign of peace and good fortune, distinct from the Nazi Hakenkreuz. Its use in that context is not the display of a Nazi symbol for the purpose of the offence. A person who displays it for a genuine religious or cultural reason is not caught.

Where do the drugs fit in?

A reference to border-controlled drugs points to the Commonwealth drug regime in the Criminal Code. Bringing a border-controlled drug into the country is an import offence. Possessing a substance that has been unlawfully imported is a separate offence. The maximum penalty steps up with the quantity, from a lower maximum for a small amount to 25 years for a marketable quantity and up to life for a commercial quantity. The precise charge depends on what the substance is and how much of it there is, which is a matter for the laboratory analysis and not for a media report. Our earlier note on Commonwealth drug import sentencing sets out how those matters are approached at sentence.

How the charges stack, and why it matters.

A single search can produce a charge sheet that spans two Acts of the Commonwealth Parliament and two Acts of the NSW Parliament. The import offence and the drug offences are Commonwealth. The prohibited-symbols offence exists at both levels. The weapons-possession offence is State. Each has its own elements, its own fault standard, and its own maximum. They are not alternatives. A person can be convicted of several of them arising out of the same facts.

This is where careful defence work begins. The first task is to sort the charges by real exposure, not by how they read. The import charge and the weapons charge are the ones that carry years, not months. The second task is to test each element. Importation asks who brought the item in and what they knew. Possession asks who had custody or control of the weapon and whether they knew it was there. The symbol offences ask about a public act, or about trade, and about the accused's state of mind. A weakness in one charge does not carry across to another. Each stands or falls on its own proof.

Where Commonwealth and State charges run together, the matter can move between the Local Court, the District Court and, for the most serious Commonwealth charges, a trial before a jury. Bail, case management and the timing of any plea all have to account for the mix. A guilty plea entered early attracts a discount for its utilitarian value under both the State and the Commonwealth sentencing regimes, but only where a plea is the right course after the brief has been tested.

What we do for a person charged.

The work starts with the brief. In a matter of this kind the core documents are the Border Force interception record, the search warrant and the property seizure record, the forensic and laboratory results, and any account the accused gave to police. Each is checked. The lawfulness of the search, the chain linking a person to an imported parcel, and the question of who knew what about the contents of a house are all live issues that the paperwork either supports or does not.

From there the defence is built charge by charge. Some charges may be defended. Some may be resolved by negotiation with the prosecuting authority, which for the Commonwealth charges is the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions and for the State charges is the NSW police prosecutor or the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. The aim throughout is to make sure a person is only ever sentenced for what the evidence actually proves. Our related notes on prohibited weapons in NSW and on weapon-related material obtained online cover neighbouring ground.

Frequently asked.

Is it illegal to import a knuckle duster into Australia?

Yes. A knuckle duster is a tier 2 prohibited import. Importing one without permission is an offence under section 233BAB(5) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth), with a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. The Australian Border Force can seize the item at the border and refer the matter to the Australian Federal Police.

Are knuckle dusters illegal to own in NSW?

Yes. A knuckle duster is a prohibited weapon under Schedule 1 of the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW). Possessing one without a permit is an offence under section 7, with a maximum penalty of 14 years' imprisonment. Each separate weapon can be charged as a separate count.

Is it illegal to display a Nazi symbol in Australia?

Yes. In NSW, section 93ZA of the Crimes Act 1900 makes it an offence to knowingly display a Nazi symbol by a public act without reasonable excuse, with a maximum penalty of 12 months' imprisonment or 100 penalty units or both for an individual. A parallel Commonwealth offence sits in section 80.2H of the Criminal Code.

What is a reasonable excuse for displaying a Nazi symbol?

The law recognises display done reasonably and in good faith for an academic, artistic, educational or other public-interest purpose. It also carves out the swastika used in connection with Buddhism, Hinduism or Jainism, which is a symbol of peace and is not a Nazi symbol for the purpose of the offence.

Can you be charged with more than one offence for a single parcel?

Yes. A single consignment can support charges under Commonwealth import law, Commonwealth and State prohibited-symbols law, and State weapons-possession law at the same time. The import charge usually carries the heaviest maximum penalty, even though the symbol charge attracts the headline.

Does the Nazi symbol law apply online?

Yes. A public act includes conduct visible to the public online, such as a post on a website or a social-media platform. Display is not limited to a physical place.

To speak to a criminal defence lawyer, call Aaron Kernaghan on 0421 717 019.

This article is written by Aaron Kernaghan, criminal defence lawyer at Good Legal Lawyers, as at 2 August 2026. It is commentary and reflects the personal opinion of the author only. It is not legal advice, it is not a substitute for advice on your own matter, and it does not purport to be accurate or complete. Any matter referred to may be before the court and any person charged is presumed innocent. For advice on a specific matter, contact Aaron Kernaghan on 0421 717 019 or contact the firm.

More criminal-law commentary by Aaron Kernaghan.

← Back to all news